Freedom of Speech and Pat Robertson

Everyone knows about what Pat Robertson said about the people of Haiti and the reason he thinks they're suffering after this horrible earthquake over the past couple of days (and for the foreseeable future). If you don't, here's a clip (Facebook users please click "See original post" below to view this):

I'm not going to comment on his remarks, other than to say that it's ridiculous to think that an entire country got together and did something like this. My past posts probably give you a pretty good idea about how I feel about the content of his statements.

What I'm going to comment on is the group of people who believe that anyone who criticizes him is against the freedom of speech that we enjoy in this country. According to many of these people, no one should be allowed to take any action against him due to his comments.

That, my friends, is what goes against the freedom of speech.

Everyone in this country absolutely has the freedom to say and believe whatever they want. They also have the responsibility to accept that they'll be judged based on what they say.

I frequently make inflammatory comments and I accept that not everyone's going to agree with me, and that people will judge me based on those comments. I said on Facebook a while back that I think that people need to realize that Fox News's reporting is based on lies and half-truths, and a fairly good friend of my family stopped following me because she doesn't agree with me. I'm sorry she did that but it's not going to stop saying what I believe.

I also know not everyone agrees with me that we need to stop using cars as much as a form of transportation, and that people are going to judge me based on that. But I'm not going to stop saying it, and I accept that some people are going to call me names and judge me based on their feelings about those statements.

Pat Robertson knows that his comments are going to upset a lot of people. And as a public figure who touches a lot of lives via his presence on television, he knows that he's going to be judged by what he says. It's pretty obvious that he has total conviction about what he's saying and accepts that he's getting judged on what he says about such things.

But those who say that we're not allowed to criticize a person because of his beliefs? That's the height of lunacy and the absolute antithesis of the point of the freedom of speech. The point of the freedom of speech is to ensure that everyone is heard and all ideas get presented. And then those ideas are subject to rational discourse. But a person also needs to realize that what you say is going to have repercussions.

Sure, Robertson has the right to say what he did. But he also has the responsibility to accept the after-effects of this comments.

Former Iraq Interrogator: Torture Doesn't Work and Endangers Our Troops

For whatever reason, our government (all the way up to our current president) is endorsing the use of torture to get information out of suspected enemies. But former Air Force officer and interrogator Matthew Alexander was responsible for finding the location of Al-Qaeda leader Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi using interrogation techniques straight out of the official military interrogations manual and NO torture.

The Washington Post ran an Op-Ed piece by him recently... read it and wonder what our government is trying to prove by torturing people!

Longhorns Get Hosed, Bring Back Nasty Memories of 1993

In 1993, the two top teams in the country were Notre Dame and Florida State. Damn, that seems like a long time ago... but I digress.

Notre Dame beat Florida State that year, head to head, during the regular season. They lost to Boston College the next week, and both ND and FSU ended the season with 1 loss. Not being in the BCS like we have now, they each played their bowl game, won, and that was that. And then FSU was awarded the top spot in the country, despite the obvious head-to-head battle that, to me, proved which team was actually better. ND got hosed.

Fast forward to 2008. Earlier this season, Texas beat Oklahoma, and then later lost a close one to Texas Tech. Both teams finish the regular season with one loss. Yet Oklahoma is voted #1 and gets put into the Big 12 Championship and later the national championship game. Same situation: the two teams had the same record, one beat the other, and yet the pollsters decided that they didn't like that so they just ignored it. So Oklahoma's playing for an undeserved national title and Texas is stuck playing #10 Ohio State.

This is why the rankings system does not work. I'm for a playoff. It's not a huge issue for me, I don't lose sleep over it (I have my daughter and her head cold to thank for that). But it amazes me that the college sports world has stood for this as long as they have. The obvious "popularity contest" nature of the rankings system should have gone by the wayside decades ago... yet it hasn't for whatever reason. Head to head play is and should be the deciding factor when records are equal. And the best way to assure head to head play is to have a playoff.

And On the Not-So-Light Side of Things...

If a VP Candidate Lies at a Convention and Everyone Ignores It, Is It Still a Lie?

Those of you who are afflicted by Palinmania, here's what I don't understand... is anyone actually paying any attention to this liar? Or are we leaving her alone because it's not nice to pick on a woman (which is, ironically, the same complaint the GOP was making about media treatment of Hillary Clinton)?

Why Geography Courses Are Necessary in the USA

I fear for our country.

Dispatch Shows Irresponsibility in Crew/West Ham Fracas Aftermath

It's official - the Dispatch is not interested in improving things at all in the City of Columbus.

In the online version of their article about the fisticuffs being thrown between rival groups of fans during halftime of the Crew/West Ham match yesterday, the Dispatch included a poll with the following title: "Does hooliganism make soccer more interesting to you?"

For those who only know about soccer via the hooligan problem, this may seem to make perfect sense. But as someone who has witnessed hooliganism first hand and seen friends affected by it (including a good friend of mine getting punched in the face because he wouldn't give a Chicago Fire "fan" a banner or scarf with a Crew logo), I can only recall the efforts that I and other US soccer fans have made to keep US soccer hooligan-free.

Let me ask you this: if the Dispatch had run such a poll after Buckeye fans showed just what wonderful fans they are when the Texas Longhorns came to visit several years ago, would the Buckeye Nation have stood for it? Not at all. So why do we stand for it when it's the Crew? They represent Columbus just as much as the Buckeyes; more, in some people's opinion.

Hooligan fans everywhere need to be treated as what they are: terrorists. They should be rounded up and sent to prison camps for causing terror for decent people who just want to attend a sporting event, but instead have to deal with issues of public safety.

And the Dispatch needs to be censured for their exhortation of such behavior.

That's One Short Plunge...

The AP is reporting that oil prices have "plunged" by $10 a barrel! Wow! We're saved! Now oil only costs...

Um... $138.00 a barrel.

I'm sorry, but this is the same stupid snow job that the oil companies have been trying to foist on us for years. Gas is up from around a $1.50 a gallon to over $4.00... but in the meantime, we've seen them raise it up to say... $2.50, then back to $2.25 in a HUGE cut! Then up to $3.00, then back to $2.75...

Folks... there's no price cut going on here. Oil is going up and it's going to stay that way. They oil companies are just waiting till we get used to a certain price level and then they lower it to a level that would previously have gotten us up in arms. It's a big joke and a snow job.

McCain '08: Like Hope, But Different

This cracked me up... and scared the living bejeesus out of me. I do not want my children having to fight in a war that we're in because of Bush and McCain being too stubborn to realize when it's time to stop.

Could an Increase in Renewable Energy Lead to More Terrorism?

This post is designed as more of a rambling thought process than as any sort of quantifiable or supportable hypothesis. Keep that in mind - the point here is to discuss, not to define or state fact.

Despite the fact that I think the idea of converting as much of our energy in the US (and yes, around the world) to renewable sources such as solar, tidal, wind, etc. is the necessary step for us to take to improve the environment and get out of the quagmire that is the Middle East, I'm also concerned that such a step will open the floodgates to a whole new set of problems. This is a discussion of some of those problems as regards terrorism.

During what is commonly called "the Dark Ages" in Europe (when in fact it was hardly any sort of dark age, from what I've been reading recently), the Middle East and Muslim culture was soaring forward on the academic and cultural fronts. Much of the learning of ancient Greece and Rome was absorbed by Muslim scholars and improved upon, and many new sciences were developed as well. The number system we use today comes directly from that used by Muslim scholars; indeed the number zero was created by the Muslim mathematicians who found need for a placeholder in their system. Truly brilliant work was done during this time, and the Muslim world was the greatest center of learning in the world during that period.

Fast forward to the discovery of oil in the Middle East. Suddenly (or not so suddenly, given the imperialist nature of European powers in the 18th and 19th centuries), the value of the Middle East was no longer in the quality of its scholars and its position as a center of learning, but rather in its location and the black, oozy mess that was under its sands.

Since that discovery, and the sudden wealth that the sheiks and shahs and the like were bringing in based on nothing more than blind luck (that the oil was under their territories), the culture of the Middle East has been in a sharp decline. Instead of centers of learning, we now had centers of power, where those who controlled the flow of oil controlled the politics as well. Learning was taken out of the equation and pure capitalism was embraced in its stead.

So we now have a once-great culture, renowned for repositories of knowledge and institutions of learning, and now simply the distributors of a product. One product - crude oil. And in that time, the Muslim world has gone from a peaceful, mostly tolerant area of the world (and despite traditional views of the Crusades, it was an invasion by the Christian world of the Muslim world) to a very factionalized area, with rampant terrorism and intolerant regimes of all sorts. Let's face it - the globalized world has not been kind to the Middle East, for the most part. Sure, there are great centers of capitalism in the Middle East such as Dubai, but how many of those people are actually benefiting from that money rolling in? That's right: very few.

Now, the primary consumers of that one product, the western world (America and Europe), are trying to move away from an oil-based energy system. A system that our demand for a single product has put in place in the Middle East is now basically going to be abandoned, now that we're increasingly done with the product. What will the outcry of that be in the Middle East?

If I was a resident of that part of the world, and I'd seen my entire country revolve around the sale of oil for decades based on the demand of the western world, only to have that demand vanish over the span of a few years, I wouldn't be a particularly understanding person. In fact, what I'd see is that the West took my country and used it up, then leaving it on its own after it served its use.

What kind of resentment is going to remain in those countries after we leave and take our money with us? And what kind of revenge are they going to seek against us after we leave?

As I see it, the one thing we'd have going for us is that no more money would be flowing out of our coffers and into theirs, so there would be less money for terrorism (and let's face it - terrorism costs money, otherwise they wouldn't need to get oil money from Arabian sheiks).

Other than that, the necessary step we are taking to reduce our use of oil is going to result in a whole new set of problems. Keep your eyes open.

I welcome your comments - please keep it civil. I don't mean to offend anyone with my comments, just to stir up some debate.

Fight Bush's Fight Against Real Change in Bali

Many of you may know that the UN's Climate Talks are underway in Bali, Indonesia right now. Naturally, the Bush Administration is doing what it can to derail any significant change.

That's why it's important to let the other representatives at that conference know that Bush does NOT speak for us as Americans in this matter.

Let them know here.

Robert Baer is My New Hero

I listen to a lot of podcasts, one of my absolute favorites being SpyCast, the podcast of the International Spy Museum. In the past, they've talked to such legends of the intelligence world as Oleg Kalugin, former major general of the KGB, about what was going on in the USSR during the Cuban Missile Crisis; Bob Rayle, former case officer with the CIA who facilitated the defection of Svetlana Alliluyeva, daughter of Josef Stalin; and Eric O'Niell, who was the FBI agent that went undercover to expose Robert Hanssen (as depicted in the movie Breach).

The latest one, though, was the tour de force for the podcast, as Peter Earnest (the museum's executive director and a former CIA case officer himself) interviewed Robert Baer, the 21-year veteran of the CIA whose primary beat was the Middle East and about whom the George Clooney character in Syriana was based.

Baer's discussion of the Middle East was absolutely fascinating, and I wish the podcast had gone on three or four times as long! Baer's take on the Middle East is disturbing and pessimistic, but truly an insider's look. He points out that Iran, via the Hezbollah uprising of a couple years ago in Lebanon, is the first Middle Eastern country to beat the Israelis in an armed conflict, and that this could put Iran on the fast train to superpower status. He discusses the techniques used to recruit suicide bombers, and gives his opinion of the value of torture as an interrogation and information-gathering technique. And he does all this without taking political sides, which is rare in this day and age.

The podcast is just about a must-listen for everyone. I plan on buying his two books See No Evil, about his experiences at ground level in the "War on Terror"; and Sleeping with the Devil: How Washington Sold Our Soul for Saudi Crude just as soon as I can get my grubby hands on them.

Listen to the podcast. It's a great look at the real dangers of the Middle East.

Olbermann: Bush Fires Assistant AG Who Proved Waterboarding is Torture by BEING WATERBOARDED!

American Hero Keith Olbermann talks about another American Hero, Daniel Levin. Watch and weep.

Worst Movie Trailer Ever

If you're wondering what Wolfpack's comments are about on this post, here's the story.

Wolfpack (my wife) and I were at the movies and this trailer came on. Keep in mind, I'm a HUGE Batman fan. And after Batman and Robin, I was feeling pretty betrayed.

The trailers came on, and this one starts with the Warner Bros. logo, and it started winding up through this creepy house, and the voice over was something like this (heavily paraphrased - I can't find the trailer online anywhere): "For decades, he has protected us from the forces of evil. He has prowled through the night, searching for evil and exposing it wherever it was found...." Meanwhile, the camera's still going up stairs, around corners, until it gets to an open window with the moon outside. And the camera stopped behind this very familar silhouette - what looked like a head with two bat-ears coming out of the top.

I was sitting on the edge of my seat, getting totally geeked out. I hadn't heard about any new Batman movie being in the works! How did this one get past me? Would it fall into the cartoony crap-trap that the original Batman movies did? Who was playing Batman? WHEN WAS IT COMING OUT? Meanwhile, Jenn was sitting next to me and shaking her head.

The voiceover continues: "And now, after years of waiting, to bring his justice to the night!" And then, just as you're expecting the Batman music to start, or something like that, the figure turns around... and it's FREAKING SCOOBY DOO!

I seriously let out a howl, right there in the movie theater! A soul-wrenching "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" Meanwhile, my wife, who's a big Scooby Doo fan, let's out with a "YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!"

So there's the story of the worst movie trailer ever. And now you're in on the joke.

Edit: "Thanks" to Matt: Here's the stupid trailer.

Scooby Doo - Batman Trailer
Uploaded by Leeowen

There's a High Rate of Exercise-Induced Asthma, Says Study. Jamie Says "Why?"

The results of a study was released recently by OSU's sports medicine department recently that speaks to the high rate of exercise-induced asthma in college varsity athletes. The department used a "eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea testing" procedure, where basically people hyperventilate themselves and then their lung function is measured. 42 of 107 athletes were diagnosed with the condition as a result. 39 of them had never had asthma diagnosed in them before.

Interesting study. It goes on to say that the rate of exercise-induced asthma (I'm just going to say asthma from now on, assume I mean this specific form of the condition) is probably higher than originally thought due to this test never having been used before.

But I think that what this test is failing to consider is that maybe the rate of asthma has actually increased, instead of just lying undiagnosed for all this time. This study could be a benchmark for a study of air quality in our city. All the athletes diagnosed were from OSU, and therefore are breathing Columbus air (which isn't the best in the world, by a long shot).

If they'd never been diagnosed before, it's possible that they come from a cleaner environment than Columbus and they didn't develop it until they got to OSU...

I'd like to see this study become a larger study - it really could be a great example of just how bad things are with air quality in the city (and around the country).

Holbrook Being Harassed For Telling Truth

Poor Karen Holbrook. It seems that people aren't allowed to tell the truth any more if it's going to be seen as offensive to someone.

From WBNS-10TV's website:

Paper: Holbrook Bad-Mouthing Buckeyes
Aug 29 2007 6:51AM

NAPLES, Florida - Former Ohio State University President Karen Holbrook reportedly told trustees at a Florida university that some who lived in OSU's campus area had "a culture of rioting" and were looking for any excuse to have "drunken orgies."

The Naples (Fla.) Daily News reported the comments came during Holbrook's recent interview for the president's job at Florida Gulf Coast University. Holbrook later dropped out of the job search.

"I went to Ohio State and had no idea there was a culture of rioting," Holbrook told the trustees. "Any good excuse gets some of the people on the street and they think it's fun to flip cars and have absolute drunken orgies."

During Holbrook's first year as OSU president in 2002, a campus-area riot after the Buckeyes' football victory over Michigan brought national attention to the university. The alcohol-fueled melee, in which cars were overturned and set on fire, resulted in more than 50 arrests.

Holbrook, 64, retired June 30 after five years as Ohio State's president.

Watch 10TV News and refresh 10TV.com for the latest developments on this story.

Hey, OSU? It's true. It's been happening ever since I moved here in 1996. Get over it, do something to fix the problem, and move on.

Cheney - Not Willing To Take His Own Advice

Words can't even describe how angry this makes me...

Pathetic Suburbanites

On my biking blog, I recently addressed a Dispatch interview with Mark McCullers, the general manager of the Crew. He was talking about Crew Stadium and the need for improvements around it. I discussed the need for bike racks and a better cycling infrastructure, as it is a biking blog.

One of the comments I received was from a fellow who calls himself "Adrock", but left no contact information. And frankly, it pissed me off. Here's his first comment:

They would also have to relocate the stadium somewhere that is acceptable for most people to take their families to, especially if by bike.

I don't go to Crew games for the same reason I don't go to Clippers games or go shopping at City Center.

Once the new baseball stadium opens though, I'll probably be cruising down there on my bike all the time. I'd definitely go to soccer games too if the stadium weren't in such an awful location. I can't imagine what our international visitors must think of Columbus when they see it.

Huh? My answer:

What's wrong with the location of Crew Stadium? It's centrally located and easily accessible from both the expressway and surface streets. Plenty of families come to Crew games all the time - in fact, crowds seem to be made up mostly of families.

And he responded just now with this:

well, for me personally, it's not a place i'd choose to go unless i had to. i grew up in hilliard and live in grandview and have friends & family that live all around other suburbs. i can tell you that a good number of us suburban folk don't find the state fairgrounds or anywhere else in the majority of the city of columbus an appealing place to go visit.

sure, call me sheltered or ignorant or anything else, but that's the way it goes.

Okay. You're sheltered and ignorant - and a bit stuck up. First of all, most of the Crew's audience is suburban families. So you really can't say that "They would also have to relocate the stadium somewhere that is acceptable for most people to take their families to" - as it's obviously perfectly acceptable for most people to take their families to. I take my family there for almost every game. My friends all do the same. Just because YOUR little enclave won't go doesn't mean MOST people won't.

Second, your need to cling to the suburbs is cultural elitism of the very worst. You don't wish to see how anyone outside your little pre-fab environment lives, so you hide and partition yourself from the real world.

Third, you're a sprawlist of the worst sort - instead of visiting something, you insist that it be brought to you instead. So you're spoiled, on top of sheltered, ignorant, and stuck up.

Not taking advantage of the things your city has to offer because of the location is just sad. And it's people like this who are responsible for much of the environmental degradation we see today via the magic of sprawl.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

Reasons to be very scared... from an AP report:

Bush to Have Colonoscopy at Camp David
By DEB RIECHMANN
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush will have a routine colonoscopy Saturday and temporarily hand presidential powers to Vice President Dick Cheney, the White House said.

That's it, we're done.

The Lies That Led To War

CBC's documentary show The Fifth Estate produced a program on the lies that led to the War in Iraq. It should be required viewing for all Americans, though it's pretty obvious that many won't watch it because it's not produced in the US.

This is 44 minutes long, but please watch it.